You are hereThe Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David Farrant

The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David Farrant

LONDON 1969, AND WIDE REPORTS WERE COMING INTO the British Psychic and Occult Society concerning a tall black apparition that had been seen lurking among the tombs of London's Highgate Cemetery. Most of these reports were from people who claimed to have been confronted by this apparition which invariably took the form of a tall dark figure and petrified people both in, or passing, the cemetery. Where possible, most of these reports were followed up but unfortunately (as is frequently the case in psychic investigations) many turned out to be vague repetition of local gossip or the result of unqualified rumour.|

Eventually a man was traced, however, who claimed to have had a first-hand encounter with this phenomenon, although he requested that his name be withheld to avoid his account from being subjected to ridicule. According to this person (referred to here as 'Thornton'), he had been 'hypnotized' by 'something' in the cemetery after he had gone there late one afternoon to look around.

As the light began to fail he decided to leave, but somehow, he became hopelessly lost. Not being a superstitious person or even believing in the existence of ghosts, he walked calmly around looking for the gate when he suddenly became aware of the presence of something behind him. Swinging around, less than six feet away, he saw a tall dark spectre hovering just above the ground. He found himself transfixed to the spot completely unable to move; drained of energy by some powerful 'hypnotic force' that in a matter of seconds rendered him unconscious to any sense of time or his surroundings. So great was the intensity of this force, that he remained like this for several minutes (or what seemed like several minutes) before the spectre abruptly vanished and he slowly regained his normal faculties.

Recalling the incident afterwards, Thornton said that it was almost as if some force of terribly evil proportions had actually sought him out with the intention of doing serious harm.

This account was intriguing. Thornton was a sincere and logical person and not the type liable to fantasy or exaggeration. (His profession as an accountant by itself suggested that his interests lay in things of a logical nature.) That he had seen 'something', there seemed little doubt, but what was especially interesting was that he had described the entity as 'seeking him out' and actually trying to cause physical harm; an uncommon occurrence with reports of ghostly confrontations when ghosts themselves are rarely reported as exercising any physical control over their human counterparts. It was a fair conclusion that the phenomenon was definitely malevolent by nature.

Several more people were interviewed in the following weeks, but again, most of these accounts turned out to be second-hand reports or exaggeration of what by now had become an already established rumour.

An exception to this, however, was one old lady who claimed she had been frightened by a 'tall dark man' who floated at her from within the cemetery gates. She had been walking her dog late one night but as she approached the gates of the cemetery, it started to howl and tried to retreat. She looked up and saw a figure with 'glaring eyes' staring at her. In a matter of seconds, it promptly vanished.

This account was also entered on the Society's files, but it seemed the next step to obtaining more precise information was to visit Highgate Cemetery in daylight to check the sites of the phenomenon's reputed appearances and perhaps discover some clues that could have otherwise accounted for its presence.

This visit was made by the author who had taken a personal interest in the case, although it turned out to be disappointing as nothing significant was found that offered any explanation - by way of a hoax or otherwise - for the two sightings.

I arrived at the cemetery in the morning and spent several hours there. It was the first time I had been there for over two years and the increase in vandalism was immediately apparent. Vaults had been broken open and coffins quite literally smashed apart. One vault near the top gate (although not visible from outside it) was wide open and one could see the remains of a skeleton where it had been wrenched from a coffin. Another vault on the main pathway had been thus entered and one of the coffins inside, set alight. Although this vault had been padlocked and chained, the door was made up of an iron grill and the vandalised coffin was available for all to see. Furthermore, it appeared that virtually no attempt had been made to repair any of the damage.

A strange thing that was discovered was a freshly dead fox lying in the middle of a main pathway. This was puzzling because there were no outward signs betraying the cause of death, and besides, a wounded animal would usually have crawled away and hidden itself if it sensed impending death.

All this, however, came no nearer to solving the mystery of the black apparition. Indeed, apart from rumour and other unsubstantiated local stories, the only real 'evidence' were the testimonies of just two people, and it seemed the only way to credit their accounts (or discredit them as the case may be) and thereby justify a full investigation, was to spend a night in the cemetery to see if the phenomenon - or whatever it was - could be witnessed. The place where Thornton had been confronted inside the cemetery seemed an appropriate place as it was secluded and there was no risk of being seen by anybody happening by the top gate - the place where the old lady had seen the entity. The date chosen was December 21st - the eve of the winter Solstice and a traditional time (due to the maximum hours of darkness) when potent psychic forces have easy access to the 'earthly plane'. That the entity may be dangerous from a psychic point of view, was a fact not overlooked. But I was confident that previous experiences with potentially malevolent psychic forces would enable me to deal with any such possibility.

Around 11 PM on the proposed night, I set off for the cemetery. It was a bitterly cold night and the surrounding area was deserted. Walking down the narrow lane that ran alongside the cemetery, there was a sudden awareness of some 'alien presence'. This was difficult to define, except in so far as there was a distinct impression of no longer being alone.

Reaching the top gate and preparing to scale this, I decided to wait a couple of minutes with the intention of perhaps noticing some material object through the gate (such as a shadow cast by a tomb-stone or from a tree moving in the wind), that could have otherwise accounted for the old lady's phantom.

Peering through the rusty bars of the gate scrutinizing the pervading darkness, objects near the gate itself lining the pathway, were fairly easy to discern. But after 20 yards or so the path disappeared into impenetrable blackness. Staring into this, perhaps due to some trick of the light, there was a distinct impression of 'something moving'. What appeared one minute to be a definite black shape or shadow, would suddenly alter its form or change in density. The wind moving through the undergrowth was probably the cause of this, but it was equally feasible that this could have been the cause of the 'black apparition' seen by the old woman.

To the right of the path, some large animal was scurrying through the undergrowth. Then suddenly, something caught my eye and looking up, just inside not 5 yards from the gate and clearly visible, was a tall dark shape.

Instinctively, my conscious mind rejected this figure as being supernatural. It was more consoling to assume that it was somebody wandering through the cemetery; notwithstanding that the figure appeared to be over seven feet tall. Any immediate doubts were soon dispelled when I saw two reddish eyes meeting my gaze from a 'black mass' at the top of the shape, which I took to be its 'head'. But these eyes were not human, rather reflected some 'alive presence'; they were dull and penetrating like some hungry wolf, although the rest of 'it' had no discernable features, apart from a vague 'human' shape.

The whole situation seemed unreal - like some unwanted dream - but with determined effort, I tore my gaze away realising that the entity was malevolent and that I had come under psychic attack. Without warning, the figure then suddenly vanished, and it appeared that for the moment, at least, the entity had retreated . . .
Part 2
An Investigation

THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BRITISH PSYCHIC AND OCCULT SOCIETY was mainly occupied by arranging an investigation into the Highgate Cemetery affair now that it could be reasonably assumed that at least some of the reports might be authentic.
It was decided that a continuous nightly vigil would take place at the cemetery, two Society members at a time being stationed in turn at the two places where the apparition had been seen to appear. Cameras and tape recorders would be set up, but as yet, no 'psychic means' - such as conducting a seance, for example - would be employed to bring about the entity's materialization. This was because, it was concluded that in the initial stages of the investigation, the gathering of evidence and observation, were of greater importance than any attempt to make direct psychic contact - especially because of the entity's apparently malignant disposition. Instead, the cemetery's history would be checked out; in particular, sightings of any other unusual phenomena in the area that might be in some way connected. Anyone who laid claim to witnessing the entity would be interviewed and statements kept of their accounts. To obtain details of other sightings, it was agreed that a short and 'non-alarmist' letter be sent to a local paper inviting people to tell of any genuine experiences so that any subscribers could be interviewed first hand.

When the investigation proper began in January 1970, I undertook the task of checking the cemetery's history. Some interesting things came to light ... First, it became apparent that stories of an apparition at Highgate Cemetery had by no means begun with the current sightings. Indeed, similar tales dated back to the Victorian era and, interestingly enough, many of them had 'vampiristic' connotations.

Perhaps the reason for this was that Stoker himself had possibly been influenced by the existence of 'something' in Highgate Cemetery. When he wrote his unique book Dracula, he makes direct reference to Highgate Cemetery (or at least, an area in the close proximity of Highgate Cemetery) as being the last resting place of one of Count Dracula's disciples.

Although Stoker may have also been influenced by the eerie case of Elizabeth Siddal who died in 1855 and who was buried in Highgate Cemetery. In 1862, her body was exhumed by a distraught relative anxious to retrieve some poems said to have been buried with her. A witness present, Charles Augustus Howell, described the 'awesome sight' of the undecayed body with 'luxuriant red-gold hair' that 'practically filled the coffin' - the implication being that Elizabeth was 'Undead', or in a state of catalepsy.

One of the common tales of that time also told of a 'tall man dressed in black' who used to disappear mysteriously through the cemetery wall. It was especially interesting to note the similarity between the Victorian sightings and the present day manifestations - especially as there was approximately 100 years difference between the two. If nothing else, this provided proof that the cemetery had been reputedly haunted for some time.

But perhaps most interesting was the 'vampire-like element' that had crept into these stories. Although it was difficult to pin-point the reasons or origins from whence the vampire legend came, it had nevertheless become an integral part of the cemetery's supernatural traditions. The Victorians, with their deep-rooted fears of the unknown and self-righteous attitudes towards religion, morals and death, may have contributed towards establishing - or perhaps re-establishing - a legend that was already in existence.

Whatever the case, it is reasonable to suppose that the Highgate phenomenon could have been connected with stories of vampirism.

Something obviously gave substance to the original sightings, though whether this 'something' was occult in origin or had a rational explanation that had been dismissed by some superstitious mind, was only debatable. One thing seemed certain, however: whatever formed the foundation of the original sightings, predated the Victorian era. To begin with, Stoker's reference to the immediate area in connection with 'vampires' almost certainly suggests that he was familiar with the local tales by then already in existence. But there was another fact to substantiate this. It dated back to the 15th century when Highgate was used as a mass burial ground for victims of the Great Plague. Highgate was probably chosen for this purpose as it was then an accessible outlying village within convenient range of London; far enough away to reduce the risk of further contamination. These unfortunate victims were brought out in cartloads from the Old City and deposited in an area which is now known as 'Church Yard Bottom', in Highgate's Queen's Wood.

All this, of course, was no more than historical fact. But what was interesting here was the possibility that the Plague deaths could have been the cause of many stories of vampirism. Basically, these burials were carried out quickly and in bulk and in all probability some people were buried whilst still alive - or in a cataleptic state.

Yet to return to the present day, the investigation also uncovered another fact of great significance, which alone possibly provided the key the current spate of hauntings. Exploration, and subsequent photographs taken in the cemetery, confirmed beyond doubt that Satanic masses had been taking place there. Furthermore, it became apparent that these masses had been conducted with great professional style (some in a maze of catacombs that ran beneath the cemetery) and were not the work of misguided amateurs.

One particular tomb hidden deep within the heart of the cemetery (in fact, a small mausoleum with a marble floor but which contained no coffins), had been converted into a small Temple, and, judging from the inverted pentagram and magical symbols inscribed on the floor and walls, was in regular usage. But more significant still, was the fact that the particular magical signs and symbols used, could only be applicable in a Rite dedicated to one of the most malign Deities to rule amongst the Old Kings of Hell and that such a Rite could only be performed by the highest of adepts, for no amateur would be capable of calling forth this Deiform.

In fact, in accordance with Satanic belief, this entity could only be summoned to the earthly plane if it was to perform some mission, and could not 'return' until that mission had been fulfilled.

Yet most important here, (and as I stated at the time), the fact that the cemetery was being thus used by dedicated Satanists, might also have a direct bearing on the frequently witnessed spectre. For just as this Deity might be invoked to visible appearance by means of a magical ritual, so might other forms of evil entities that might remain permanently 'earth-bound'.

It was therefore quite feasible to assume that the cemetery phenomenon was an evil entity that had been summoned up as the direct result of a Satanic ritual or alternatively, that the Satanists had succeeded in 'awakening' the latter-day vampire which had laid dormant for so long.

Whatever the case, it was evident that the Force (or Forces) being dealt with was malignly supernatural and protective measures may eventually have to be taken to safeguard against psychic attack.

Such a possibility was not taken lightly, in view of the apparent performance of the entity so far and the added frequency of its appearances.

Already, just two weeks after the investigation had started, two of the nightly watchers spotted it again on two separate occasions.

The first time, it appeared behind two Society members on watch at the 'Thornton spot'. Swinging around as if compelled by some over-whelming impulse, they both saw the entity hovering behind, but just as abruptly, it disappeared. Again, two other members saw it through the top gate on their way to keep the nightly vigil. On neither occasion, however, did the entity appear for more than a couple of seconds. It was almost as if it 'knew' it was being hunted down and had no intention of allowing anybody to fire flash-guns at it.

It should be said here that - contrary to popular belief - some types of supernatural phenomena, albeit not apparently discernable in the normal sense, can be photographed and there was every indication that the Highgate spectre fitted into this category. Although such photographs are rarely taken as credible evidence for the proved existence of ghosts, they would nevertheless have eliminated any logical causation (such as the possibility of hoaxing, for example) that could otherwise have accounted for the sightings.

But photographs did reveal several more foxes that were discovered dead in the cemetery. Unlike the previous one discovered, however, many of these had deep wounds to the throat.

There was no direct evidence to link these attacks to stories now circulating about a 'vampire', of course, but it was an interesting speculation (some might say a chilling reminder) to recall that in his book Dracula, Bram Stoker refers to a 'vampiric entity' that wandered in the vicinity of Hampstead at night and was responsible for 'attacking' young children.

In the meantime, there was a significant response to my letter to the local newspaper, The Hampstead and Highgate Express (Ham and High). This had taken the form of a simple request for information about the reported ghost, and to avoid any frivolous response, I had deliberately omitted any reference to a 'vampire'.

The week after I had made this request, in fact, four people wrote in to the newspaper all moreorless confirming the phenomenon's existence. One lady wrote:

My fiancée and I spotted a most unusual form about a year ago. It just seemed to glide across the path. Although we waited a little while, it did not reappear again. I am glad someone else has spotted it; I was convinced it was not my imagination.
Miss Audrey Connely.
(Ham and High, February 13th, 1970)

Another reader confirmed the existence of a ghost at the cemetery but although not having seen it himself, concluded ...

The ghost will sometimes appear nightly for about a week, and then will not be seen again for perhaps a month. To my knowledge the ghost always takes the form of a pale figure and has been appearing for several years.
K. Frewin
(Ham and High, February 13th, 1970)

The Ham and High obviously noticed the local interest in the subject and themselves took up the story inviting other readers to write in and tell of their experiences. Although with typical newspaper sceptism, they warned that they would check the authenticity of all letters received lest anybody attempted to 'spoof them with spooks'.

Prompted by this invitation, the following weeks brought many more letters from people who claimed to have seen the apparition.

Wrote one reader:

A figure such as that seen by readers does haunt Highgate Cemetery. I caught sight of it while I was walking around the cemetery. Suddenly, from the corner of my eye, I saw something move and immediately looked around to see a 'form' moving behind some gravestones. My first reaction was that it was somebody 'mucking about' but looking back it seems strange that the thing made no sound and seemed to disappear into nowhere.
D. Winbourne
(Ham and High, February 20th, 1970)

Another reader expressed great dismay that her house was perhaps situated a little too close to the cemetery and that in view of all the stories, the cemetery entity should be seriously looked into.

Yet some readers portrayed more than a little sceptcism. One wrote:

Swain's Lane on a cloudy, windswept moonlit night, with its cemetery, overhanging branches, sparsely-peopled, ill-lit, and rather Gothic, has the same effect on some people as reading a good ghost story, and we all see ghosts after reading ghost stories ...And he concluded:

... The British Occult Society is to be congratulated on fighting a brave last ditch battle on behalf of the romantics in bringing their 'wampyr' [vampire] out of its dusty covers and presenting it once again for public display, but alas, it is too late, by at least three generations.
S. Levitt
(Ham and High, February 27th, 1970)

Although some letters contained irrelevant fact, many contained valuable information and by interviewing their subscribers, it was possible to put together a fairly concise record about the nature of the phenomenon and its appearances. Basically, it seemed it usually took the form of a tall dark figure and appeared mainly in an area around the top gate.

This corresponded more or less exactly with my encounter, and those of Thornton and the old woman.

The Ham and High, however, seemed especially interested in the 'vampire' possibility and the fact that black magic had been taking place at the cemetery. On March 6th, 1970, they ran a front page story entitled, perhaps appropriately "WHY DO THE FOXES DIE?" The implication was, was that in some manner the 'ghost' was no less than a 'vampire' which had been responsible for the death of the foxes. It was interesting hypothesis, and one which had not been overruled by the author himself. In fact, I held the view that as the phenomenon seemed definitely malevolent by nature, it was quite conceivable that it possessed sufficient power to have some affect upon 'weaker forms of intelligence's' - such as animals. Alternatively, there was the possibility that the foxes had somehow been trapped by the Satanists and used as sacrifices in black magic rituals.

In reality, the Satanic group that were using Highgate Cemetery hadn't taken kindly to the Society's investigation which had exposed their activities to the public view. The weeks that followed brought a spate of threatening letters to the Society. Essentially, these letters warned that the Society's investigation at the cemetery must be stopped or there would be 'disastrous consequences' - namely, 'death' to be effected by means of black magic.

A typical letter to the author, read:

By your interference with the work of our High Order, you have invoked the wrath of Lord Hadit. By His element and the power of the Seven-Fold Cross, you shall now be destroyed. This is decreed by His Grace, and this wish will be fulfilled through our Order. Be it thus so ...

The letter was signed in blood and adorned with satanic symbols; mainly to the effect that I had offended the Satanic god Hadit who, through the media of his worshippers, was about to reek terrible revenge.

There was no doubt that the sender - or senders - of these letters were genuine Satanists. For one thing, the secret signs which adorned the letters, would only be known to authentic practitioners of the Black Arts. Yet the letters did not cause undue concern. Previous experience by the Society with black magic groups gave us enough confidence to file these letters and forget about them.

In the meantime, public interest in the Highgate Cemetery affair had attracted the interest of Independent Television. They were preparing a programme on the 'ghost' and invited the author to give an account of the investigation. Initially, this request had to be denied, as Society policy forbade the release of any information to the media about internal investigations unless, or until, these were complete. But I finally agreed to verify my own personal encounter with the phenomenon. This programme was shown on 13th March, 1970 - although it was not filmed without some mishap. When the film crew began filming outside the top gate (they were not given permission to film inside, the cemetery Superintendent, Mr. William Law, explaining that this was 'against regulations'), the camera man suddenly clutched his throat and passed out. The filming had to be postponed until a replacement took over. Sandra Harris, the interviewer, was visibly shaken; more so probably, as she had already witnessed the deplorable damage inside the cemetery. (In fact, whilst she was walking through the cemetery with the film crew and myself a little earlier, we had all witnessed a vandalised coffin that had been removed from an old vault and was lying in the middle of a pathway. Its lid had been ripped off, and the skeleton inside was clearly visible.)

During the interview, and to avoid any possible sensationalism about 'vampires', I took great care to avoid such a term when referring to the phenomenon. Of course, it was realised that local opinion tended to support a 'vampire theory', but I certainly didn't accept the existence of vampires in their strictly commercialised sense and I had no intention of being misunderstood or misquoted. Another man who was being interviewed, however, (a somewhat theatrical character dressed in undertakers' clothes who had been pestering local newspaper's looking for publicity since he had first become aware of the Society investigation), claimed that the phenomenon was really the 'King Vampire' and, after producing a crucifix and a home-made wooden stake, announced that to destroy a vampire one must ... 'first drive a stake through its heart with one blow, chop off its head with a gravedigger's shovel, then burn what remains'!

Of course, this amateurish verbiage would not have been taken seriously by genuine occultists but the situation was made worse when this person went on to claim that ... " 'David Farrant' would be returning to Highgate Cemetery that same evening' to 'perform this dangerous mission." And for further effect, he warned of what he saw as the 'dangerous consequences' facing anyone foolish enough to take on the 'King Vampire'.

Although these remarks were obviously intended to create maximum publicity, in reality, they were based on a misunderstanding of a report in the local Press the previous week when, humouring some over-zealous reporter, I had stated that if the apparition at Highgate Cemetery turned out to be anything like a 'vampire', I, for one, would be prepared to take any means necessary so that everybody could 'rest in peace'.

But to make matters worse, this person's remarks were put over the air, and later that night following the television transmission, several hundred people converged on Highgate Cemetery to witness a non-existent 'vampire hunt'.

One of these was a school teacher from Essex called Alan Blood (in fact, his real name) who had traveled to London after seeing the programme to take part in the 'vampire hunt'. He had even brought several students with him to join in this quest.

I was approached by Alan Blood who wanted permission to join in the 'hunt' but I was forced to explain that it was not possible to conduct any serious psychic investigation under the unfavourable conditions created by the television programme (people were flocking to Highgate Cemetery en-masse including groups of hooligans carrying beer cans and makeshift weapons to take on the 'vampire' and who looked as if they could have turned nasty) and that the whole charade had been instigated at my expense.

Needless to say, no Society members joined in this charade, but the 'hunt' still went ahead, its outcome being reported in the Press the following day.

The London Evening News reported the situation by saying:

Nearly 100 people joined in a vampire-hunt at Highgate Cemetery today.  They included a vampire expert named Mr. Alan Blood who journeyed 40 miles to investigate this legend of an 'Undead Satan-like being' said to lurk in the area.  Spectators gathered in the spooky darkness after watching a TV interview last night, Friday 13th, in which a man said he was going to exorcise an evil spirit he claimed he had seen three times.

Curious onlookers managed to scale the 10 foot wall in search of an open tomb. Several people scrambled back frightened claiming they had seen 'something crawling' in the dark.

Anthony Robinson aged 27 of Ostel Road, Hampstead came to the cemetery after hearing of the torchlight hunt.

"I walked past the place and heard a high pitched noise, then I saw something grey moving slowly across the road. It terrified me."

"First time I couldn't make it out, it looked eerie. I've never believed in anything like this, but now I'm sure there is something evil lurking in Highgate."

The vampire expert, history teacher Alan Blood, 25, traveled from Chelmsford, after he saw David Farrant, 24, speak of his plans to stake the vampire through the heart with a wooden cross.
(Evening News, March 25th, 1970.)

Yet aside from the 'sensational slant' of this article, I remained sceptical about this particular sighting. It was more likely over-wrought imagination combined with a mild form of mass hysteria, had created 'ghosts' where there were none to be seen. There was more concern about the potential effects arising from such publicity for this was bound to attract further vandalism to the cemetery, which in turn, would hamper the investigation proper and upset both the cemetery authorities and the police. Added to this, was as a result of the unsubstantiated ravings made by the person on the television and subsequent coverage of these by the Evening News, 'David Farrant' had been irrevocably branded as the main instigator of this mass vampire hunt and a man who quite literally believed in the existence of 'blood-sucking vampires'.

Meanwhile, the vigil by the Society at the cemetery continued, although there were no significant developments and the phenomenon was not sighted. It seemed the 'vampire' had not taken kindly to the mass intrusion of its privacy and had 'gone to ground' to avoid further persecution.

It was therefore decided to carry out the original idea and conduct an occult ceremony at Highgate Cemetery one night in order to summon the entity forth, and possibly, communicate with it. This ceremony was to be conducted with a High Priestess and other members of the Circle, some of whom were members of the British Psychic and Occult Society.

Unfortunately however, an unforeseen event prevented this planned ceremony from taking place, although it was agreed that another date be set for this at the first available opportunity. . .

Part 3

IN AUGUST 1970, there was another development in the Highgate investigation. That month, the body of a woman was dragged from a vault in Highgate Cemetery, staked through the heart, and left lying in the middle of a main pathway. The fact that this was discovered by two schoolgirls made the incident even more gruesome. The Hornsey Journal's reportage of this incident, perhaps also did little to allay the already public growing concern over reports of 'black magic' and vandalism at Highgate Cemetery.

Evidence of vandalism at the cemetery was, of course, no new thing. But the element of 'staking the corpse', seemingly as the aftermath of some black magic rite, pointed convincingly to the work of the Satanists and their possible connection with the phenomenon.

Soon afterwards, it was decided to conduct the postponed ritual; the object was to summon the entity, make psychic communication with it and then - if it proved to be malevolent, which seemed an obvious fact - banish it from the earthly plane by conducting an appropriate rite of exorcism. The view was held that, if indeed the author's personal theory was correct, and the Satanic group were in some way responsible for 'controlling' the entity's appearances by means of black magic, such an exorcism would also dispel much of this group's power by negating the evil they had summoned into existence.

It was almost full moon (three days preceding the full moon and those immediately after being especially favourable for conducting magical ceremonies), and it was decided to hold the seance at midnight on August 17th.

Accordingly, Highgate Cemetery was entered late one night on the appointed date, the purpose basically, to conduct this psychical seance. The place chosen was the 'Thornton spot' as this was secluded and well within the cemetery.

In requirements for this ritual, a large circle was inscribed upon the ground which was adorned by protective symbols and 'sealed' with consecrated water and salt. Some ten feet away from this, where the phenomenon would be summoned to appear, a smaller circle was cast with protective symbols (it had not been overlooked that we were dealing with a particularly lethal form of psychic energy).

When the preparations were complete, the seance commenced but after only a few minutes, torchlight's could be seen in the distance and there was the muffled sound of human voices. It was the police: still some way off but approaching the back gate of the cemetery. This presented something of a dilemma; for not only was it dangerous - from a psychic point of view - to leave the protective circle once the ceremony had commenced, but there was the very real problem of explaining such clandestine nightly activity and being believed, let alone being understood. Because of this, the psychic paraphernalia was quickly gathered up and respective members headed for different exits in the cemetery.

On a sudden impulse, I made for the back wall, which the police were approaching, thinking it was possible to reach this without being spotted and then scale this further along. After all, this was the only way out. Unfortunately, just by the wall, I was caught by a flashlight and quickly arrested. Luckily, however, the police must have assumed their captive was alone and they made no attempt to look for other people.

Perhaps ironically, any concern about being arrested was not so much for fear of having done anything wrong or illegal, but because the seance would be misunderstood and such misapprehension could attract adverse publicity to the investigation and the Society.

For this reason, the ceremonial paraphernalia I was carrying (which included candles, incense, a wooden cross adorned with protective magical symbols and a small tape-recorder) was quickly discarded in the undergrowth by the back wall hoping this would go unnoticed. Unfortunately, this was discovered and was to form the basis of a police charge of 'being in an enclosed area for an unlawful purpose' - although this 'purpose' was not clarified in the charge itself.

The case came before Magistrate Christopher Lea at Clerkenwell Magistrates' Court two weeks later, although it had to be adjourned as the Detective Sergeant in charge, Neville Brown, had apparently suffered a mild heart attack. In any event, the police were unable to proceed and the case was re-scheduled for September 29th.

The main evidence put forward to support the charge was that the Defendant had been caught whilst leaving Highgate Cemetery with a cross and 'wooden stake' (this 'wooden stake' was, in fact, merely a pointed piece of wood used with string to cast - or measure out - a magical Circle), his intention (according to the Prosecution) to seek out and destroy the legendary vampire that slept in a coffin in the cemetery. During this process, the Prosecution claimed, coffins would have had to be opened to find the vampire.

Logically, of course, in principle some of this may have been correct, but, due to my reluctance to give details of the seance realising that these would never be understood because of their occult connotations, and my refusal to name members involved in the investigation, the facts had been grossly distorted.

It was not true, for example, that I had been arrested with just a cross and a 'stake' but the other items I had been carrying had 'mysteriously disappeared' and had not been produced in evidence. Neither was it true that there had been any intention to 'open coffins', but the established link between 'vampires' and coffins had been sufficient to give grounds to this allegation. Ignorance and superstitious assumption - and almost certainly a desire to produce a scapegoat for all the vandalism and desecration at Highgate Cemetery - had done the rest.

If I had any doubts about the latter these were quickly dispelled when Neville Brown proceed to read out a statement which amounted to a verbal admission by myself to the charge. The crux of this admission was as follows ...

At midnight I went with the Cross and the stake to St. Michael's churchyard" [which backs on to Highgate Cemetery] "to look for the vampire. Had the police not arrived when they did my intention was to make my way to the catacombs to search for it. I would have entered the catacombs and inspected the coffins in my search, and upon finding the supernatural being, I would have driven my stake through its heart and then run away.

How this statement had ended up in this form and in a vernacular totally foreign to that of the author's, perhaps indicates how the whole thing was proceeding. But this notwithstanding, the case was dismissed, the Magistrate (this time Mr. DJ Purcell) accepting a Defence denial of this 'admission' and a further submission that I had already been featured on the television in connection with the investigation; and that, in any event, it was just as akin to 'hunt for vampires' as it was for some people to spend vast sums of money trying to locate the Loch Ness Monster.

The Magistrate added that there had been no intention to 'damage coffins' and that the cemetery was not an enclosed area in the strict legal sense.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the police were none too pleased at this decision or the publicity the case had attracted; although any publicity had only been forthcoming because they had brought the case to court in the first place and introduced outrageous statements throughout about 'staking vampires' attributed to myself which had no relation to the real facts of the investigation. It is little wonder that such outrageous statements were seized upon by the Popular Press, but the fact that many of these statements found their way into print but were not retracted afterwards when proved to be false by very virtue of my acquittal, (and even today, many of these earlier newspaper accounts lie erroneously on record), merely confirmed that serious psychic investigation could not be entrusted to the understanding of the police, or the Press.

In fact, some newspapers had a 'hey day' with all this sensationalism and some let their imaginations loose beyond the bounds of credibility. The Daily Express said, for example, that the Society had 'over 100 members looking for vampires all over Europe'! Belief in vampires may well have been prevalent all over Europe in the Middle Ages, as originally stated, but this historical fact was certainly not the immediate concern of the British Psychic and Occult Society!

With a little more sobriety, although not without a hint of sarcasm, the Baltimore Sun observed that apparently it was 'no longer a crime to hunt vampires in England'.

But the publicity brought by the court case made it impossible, at this stage, for the investigation to continue. Attracted by reports of 'vampires', scores of people visited Highgate Cemetery and desecration and vandalism of graves and tombs increased to an alarming degree. People flocked to the cemetery in droves and police were frequently called to evict groups of hooligans or self-professed 'vampire hunters'. Indeed, the situation had become so grave, that on Hallowe'en night, 1970, police literally had to throw a cordon of police cars around Highgate Cemetery to prevent people from entering on the night of the undead.

One small group of aspiring occultists, however, seemed to have evaded the ongoing police presence and claimed to performed a 'secret exorcism' at a tomb in the cemetery that had been desecrated by Satanists; although the only 'evidence' to support this was a photograph that had been sent to the Hornsey Journal showing a man dressed in an evening suit brandishing a crucifix and wearing a 'garlic necklace' posing outside some unrecognisable tomb in the cemetery.

Contacting the Society for comment, the Hornsey Journal were informed that we recognised the person concerned as a well known prankster and, if in line with his past record, the whole thing was just a well timed publicity stunt.

Unfortunately, a sad side to all this activity at the cemetery, at least, as far as some elements in the police and the media were concerned, was that the Society itself was held directly responsible for influencing its occurrence. This was an especial irony, when I had already stated publicly on several occasions that this sort of activity was to be deplored and had nothing to do with genuine psychic investigation. Indeed, in a article I was to write for a local paper scarcely a year later, I stated that the growing menace of Satanism in general - especially at Highgate Cemetery - was a 'very real menace indeed'. (This article appeared in the Islington Gazette on September 29th, 1972, and in it I also pointed out that it was the young, with their tendency to think they were invulnerable, who were most at risk to the dangers of Satanism. Attracted by some 'dare-devil' instinct to the challenge of Satanism, some would became entrapped in a web of corruption and degradation from which there was usually no escape).

But before the publication of this article, BBC Television decided to mount their own investigation and sent a team of cameramen and reporters to see if they could locate the 'vampire'. Although they were unsuccessful, what they did find was a mass of desecrated coffins, many of which had been deprived of their lead. Invited on the programme, I explained that although most of the desecration was the work of vandals, the activities of the Satanic group was a very real problem, as was the existence of the 'vampire-like' entity that had been witnessed there. This programme was televised on October 15th, 1970 and went some way in vindicating my claims that black magic was being practised at Highgate Cemetery.

But regarding the threats from the Satanic group, they had apparently given up. The threatening letters suddenly ceased and it was likely that - as they saw it - the damage done by the Society in exposing their activities to the public view had already been done and so there was no point in continuing their vendetta.

Meanwhile, there was a major development at Highgate Cemetery. Reports were coming into the Society that a young girl had been 'attacked' by the 'vampire' in Swains Lane which runs alongside the cemetery. Eventually, the girl's identity was discovered and I arranged a meeting with her. Although reluctant to discuss the matter at first, I assured her anonymity and she gave the following account:

She was returning home in the early hours walking down Swain's Lane. As she passed the cemetery, a little way further on, she was suddenly 'thrown to the ground' with tremendous force by a 'tall black figure' with a 'deathly white face'. At that moment, a car stopped to help her and the figure 'vanished' in the glare of the headlights. She was taken to Highgate Police Station in a state of severe shock suffering abrasions to her knees and elbows. The police immediately made a thorough search of the area but could find no trace of her attacker. More mysterious still was the fact that where the figure had vanished, the cemetery was lined by 15 foot high walls.

On hearing this, I felt a tinge of apprehension. Until now, the 'vampire's' appearances had been mainly confined to frightening people. It seemed now, however, that the 'creature' was becoming 'bolder' and presented a real threat to innocent people. If it had attacked somebody once, it could do so again. Only next time, with more disastrous consequences.

It was decided to conduct a full scale ceremony in Highgate Cemetery whereby the phenomenon would be summoned and then banished back to its preordained place of existence.

This time, however, the Ceremony would involve the use of High Magic as a means of communicating with the demonic entity. It was not dared to use less than an advanced form of ritual. At least, if the ritual was not successful, it would be possible to control the entity, whereas Low magical techniques - albeit less complex - could not have afforded adequate protection ...

Part 4
The Reckoning

ON JUNE 21ST, 1971, several members of a secret Occult Order gathered in Highgate Cemetery to perform one of the most dangerous magical rituals in existence. The motivation for performing this ritual was to counteract the activities of a Satanic Coven who had violated magical Law by evoking a malevolent evil force to execute their own desires; the basic object being to establish psychic 'contact' with the existing phenomenon (or 'vampire') and thereby negate the diabolical power that had been brought into existence.

Of course, such a task was by no means easy for, in magic, darker forces are most potent when summoned to the earthly plane and may only be revoked by a White magical ritual. Thus in context - and in accordance with magical law - an extreme force of evil may only be counteracted and neutralised by an equivalent force of Good. Any other method - if attempted - would have little effect and, in all probability, would only serve to aggravate an 'opposing evil force'.

For the sake of the uninitiated, and to allay any confusion arising from this point, a few words should be said here to explain the difference between white magic and black magic, and black magic and Satanism.

Firstly, it should be understood that magic itself is neither 'black' nor 'white' - it is neutral. Furthermore, magic is only a psychic element through which 'outside' forces may be evoked, not itself active but only a channel through which such forces may be brought into operation.

Of course, these supernatural forces which can be summoned as a result of magical techniques are both good and evil (or 'white' and 'black'), but even the definition of these forces is a man-made conception.

Yet this is not to say that magic alone is harmless, for although it may only act as a catalyst in producing an end result, the very nature of its source makes it lethal in the hands of those who don't understand it - rather like a trainee chemist who does not know which chemicals, if mixed together, will cause an explosion.

Therefore, it may be seen that magic is only governed and subsequently labeled by the intentions of those using it. It follows, that a 'black' magician may also be a 'white' one, and vice versa.

With Satanism, however, it is a slightly different matter. For here, unlike a magician who can harness various types of forces at will and without obligation, a Satanist is dedicated to the continual service and worship of evil powers. And as he cannot retain the neutrality of the magician, (the very doctrines of Satanic belief make this impossible) he becomes bound, or possessed, by the dark forces he has pledged to serve. Thus, unlike black magic, Satanism is a form of religious belief, and because of the doctrines and requirements laid down in its beliefs, it is far more potent and dangerous.

The communication ritual was performed after taking all these things - and more - into consideration. According to the magical requirements of the ritual, a Circle was constructed on the ground in which were placed various ceremonial items. These included vessels of consecrated water, charcoal and salt, and protective talismans which each member must wear. Different coloured candles were placed at strategic points around the circumference to correspond with the elements of air, fire, earth and water. whilst a small fire burned steadily in the middle. To the North of the Circle a small 'sealed' triangle was cast (also containing a small fire) where the entity would be summoned to appear, and hopefully, be able to 'communicate' with a psychic medium who would be inside the protective Circle.

When all was prepared, the ritual commenced and was timed so that the vital part would coincide with midnight.

The first part of the ritual was dedicated to the relevant incantations and 'Calls' necessary to summon forth the entity. These magical 'Calls' were made in strict accordance with the form of ritual and served two purposes: to dispel any unwanted elementals which might have hindered the appearance of the entity, and to open a channel of psychic energy through which the entity could later materialise.

When the preliminary part of the ritual had been completed, the actual evocation to summon the entity then began.

The intrinsic details regarding this part of the ritual, however, may not be disclosed as this would violate magical secrecy; suffice it is to say that the entity would be magically induced to appear in the triangle where it would have a direct 'psychic line' to communicate with the medium.

As midnight approached, the medium began to make the Commands for manifestation and almost immediately the Circle turned icy cold as though some warm power had suddenly left it, and the candles went out. Simultaneously, the fire in the triangle was obliterated by a misty smoke and some sinister force seemed to be amidst everyone present. For the next minute or so, nothing happened. There was no wind and it seemed unnaturally silent and the fire in the Circle cast an eerie red glow over everything. Suddenly, the area was full of a dense mist, more intense around the triangle, and in this, scarcely discernible through the haze, was a quivering 'black shape' that seemed to be trying to materialise. The medium spoke aloud, attempting to aid 'its' materialisation and all at once, two eyes could be seen at the top of the moving black form. They were the same eyes that I had witnessed inside the gate, dull red and almost diabolically evil; only this time, they had increased in strength to such a degree that it was like being confronted by some 'living presence'.

A girl present screamed and fainted, but such was the hypnotic power of the entity, that nobody was really conscious of her. There seemed to be a tremendous power emanating from the distinct eyes that was magnified even more by the flickering firelight and it was at this stage that I realised that the entity might be too powerful to control and we would be entrapped in the Circle. The whole thing was like a vivid dream; that you had a complete awareness of what was happening, only with little means of controlling it.

Strangely, (and this was an impression that other members later recalled) there was no sense of imminent 'evil intent' from the entity, it being more an impression that it was trying to 'absorb' you.

Seeing the dangers of prolonging the ritual, without hesitation - although not without some effort - the medium and myself performed a rite of banishment during which the entity promptly vanished.

Yet, notwithstanding the manifestation and urgent dismissal of the entity, the ritual had not been a complete success. For although the entity's materialisation had proved a success and it had been possible to dismiss it, circumstances had not allowed time for a full exorcism and, to this extent, it still remained earthbound.
But the ceremony had established beyond doubt - at least as far as most serious psychic investigators were concerned - that the majority of sightings, and witnessed encounters relating to the Highgate phenomenon, were not entirely without foundation.

Unfortunately, however, it was realised that such proof would hardly be acceptable to the hardened sceptic, but we had at least succeeded in establishing that not only did some genuine psychic presence exist at Highgate Cemetery, but had also uncovered valuable information about the nature of the phenomenon and possible aspects that might have primarily caused its existence.

Of course, while it could not be irrefutably stated that this 'demonic' entity was the direct result of Satanic activity, it could be reasonably said that Satanic practices had perhaps been the cause of activating some age-old supernatural phenomenon.

Given that the investigation at Highgate Cemetery still remained incomplete - an opinion, shared by most Society members - not long afterwards it was decided to again return to the cemetery with a view to perhaps obtaining some photographic evidence by means of performing another ceremony.

This though, was never to be. The police, keeping surveillance as a result of continuing vandalism, arrested two members just inside the gates.

On this occasion, however, they were released as no offence had been committed but the Press picked up the story the next day (presumably as a result of police information) and more attacks were leveled against the Society's name.

With the usual precision of Fleet Street, the Society investigation was irrevocably limited to a continuation of clandestine midnight manoeuvres that took place amongst dank decaying tombs inhabited by a 'blood-sucking vampire', whilst the author, in turn, was reduced to some modern-day Van Helsing type vampire hunter.

Ironically, perhaps, concerning the Highgate phenomenon itself, the Press may have for once come closer to the truth than they originally intended.

Copyright David Farrant

[Much of this material has been abridged from the 4th edition of the author's book, "Beyond the Highgate Vampire]

User offline. Last seen 2 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...


I think people will have noticed you have deliberately avoided answering the comments of the producer of the French TF1 channel, ‘anonymous, whereby she admitted (at least in the full article) that the pictures supplied to them of a ‘decomposing vampire’ (by a ‘bishop’) had been deliberately faked. Not only had they been faked, but they were of the person himself wearing make up which consisted of flour and paper mache.

I saw this film myself in person along with 4 other people in 1969. I have not only ‘just recently’ mentioned this films I made and Talks I gave dating back some 30 years or so. You may not have been personally present; but these are nevertheless all on record.

The pictures taken of myself in Highgate Cemetery (and the one’s of your close associate, Hill) back in 1970, ‘anonymous’ were taken by yourself as you well know. But there was no flour on my face. If there is now then it must have been put there by some photographic computer programme, which you do all the time with photographs in your vain attempts to ridicule people you may not happen to like. We should perhaps remember that both yourself and the person ‘Hill’ once used to work in a photograph studio; which is no doubt where your learned your ‘special vampire effects’.

On one occasion in the early 1980’s, ‘anonymous’, when visiting me at my flat, you gave me some six photographs (including some from this set) which you were asking me to send to French author Jean Paul Bourre who lived in Paris. For some reason, you had fallen out with your ‘chum’ at this time (although at this time we had both signed a ‘Peace Treaty’) and were trying to get myself to send incriminating photographs of himself to Paris as proof that he was a ‘black magician’ and a ‘Satanist’. In a couple of these pictures your ‘chum’ was dresses in woman’s clothing and in another he was completely nude. You admitted to having taken these photographs yourself, ‘anonymous. You left these pictures with me to send. I said I would post them, but in fact, never did,

The point here. ‘anonymous’ is that I can prove what I say, or at least you can because I secretly recorded the whole of this conversation. I still have many of these original tapes, and can make copies for anyone interested.

In the meanwhile, I transcribed many of these conversations and published them in my book “The Seangate Tapes”. The conversation described above is among them.

This book is not some ‘underground publication’, by was assigned an official number and deposited with the six main University Libraries. And it is still very much available.

So before you keep insisting in telling all your ancient lies about myself, ‘anonymous’, I suggest you consider that I can prove anything that I have stated. You can not, simply because it is not true. This is not a very ‘Christian way’ to carry on, is it ‘anonymous’!?

David Farrant, President, British Psychic and Occult Society

User offline. Last seen 2 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

PS 'anonymous',

Maybe I should send a copy of "The Seangate Tapes" to more people on Forums such as these. I amj sure they would be interested in what you originally said . . .

David Farrant, President, bPPOS

Vampire Research Society's picture
Vampire Researc...
User offline. Last seen 6 years 32 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

These photographs of you have not been altered and I invite anyone to closely examine your face in them:

You have applied something like flour to your face to give the appearance of a ghost. This was at a time when you were attempting to hoax a ghost story in your local newspaper. That you were doing this has been corroborated by virtually everyone who knew you four decades ago, including the man who colluded with you in that endeavour. He only went along with your hoax as long you later admitted to the public via the media that it had all been a massive hoax. You didn't believe in the supernatural and wanted to put two fingers up at those who did while demonstrating how easily the press can be fooled.

When you didn't keep your side of the deal with Hill and refused to come clean about the hoax you had perpetrated, Hill wanted no more to with you and you were left on your own. This is when you turned to vampires, witchcraft and the occult to attract attention to yourself. You became so desperate for publicity and to see your name in print that you were driven to making more extreme claims in newspapers.

This led to your ultimate downfall which resulted in a stiff prison sentence.

I cannot address the remainder of your rant because it is meaningless gibberish from the darker recesses of your confused and paranoid mind. I do not know you and have never met you. What I know of you, however, is quite sufficient. You are a sad and lonely individual who dwells in the distant past where you live among non-existent ghosts formed by your own twisted and poisonous imagination. Everything you write and self-publish is fixated with attacks and abuse directed at just one person who nowadays ignores you while you have spent an entire lifetime waging a mindless vendetta. Nobody in their right mind takes you remotely seriously and every stable person can see through your baleful intent. The tiny clique you persuade to join your hate campaign are transparently unbalanced and disturbed.

Some people feel sorry for you because you come across as utterly pathetic and lost. But I am not one of them. I see you for what you really are: vindictive, malicious and evil.

The hatred that is your sustenance has ultimately come to devour you and left the shambling wreck we witness before us. I could put it no better than the man you have failed to harm despite making the attempt for almost half a century:


User offline. Last seen 2 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

"You have applied something like flour to your face to give the appearance of a ghost. This was at a time when you were attempting to hoax a ghost story in your local newspaper"

No. YOU have really caught yourself out now, 'anonymous'! Those original photographs were taken at Highgte Cemetery in 1970 by yourself in person, as you well know. You have now 'doctored' two of these, probably using photoshop or something.

So lets examine the actual evidence, shall we,? not your fabricated version.

A close up of one of those photograohs was first published in No 1 of "New Witchcraft" magazine in 1975 and, incidentally, was sent to the magazine editor, Brian Netshar, whom you were then in direct correspondece with using your real name. New Witchcraft used you photograph to accompany an article I had submitted to them about Wicca title "As she is Spoke".

This photograph filled nearly the whole page of the magazine and my face can be seen in detail (I still have the original magazine). There is no 'white substance' on my face whatsoever, so we can only ask ourselves now, just exactly how did it get in a photograph (or photographs) now referenced by yourself here?

There is no need to say anything further really 'anonymous'.
You have just proved yourself to be an absolute faker; and all ths without any help from myself!

You are obviously only trying to 'reverse' my exposure of how your so-called Highgate 'vampire' photograph was faked by using flour. And people don't have to look twice at that photograph to see who it really is.

Whoops, 'anonymous'!

David Farrant, President, British Psychic and Occult Society

Vampire Research Society's picture
Vampire Researc...
User offline. Last seen 6 years 32 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

Examine closely the face in the photographs at the above links. They have belonged to the VRS archive since, together with the negative film, they were donated by the photographer who took them along with later pictures of you cavorting in Highgate Cemetery with a cross and stake in your hands. See

Nothing has been "doctored" or "photoshopped" as examination reveals. You have made yourself look like a ghost and in one of the images you are clearly attempting to hold a frightening expression. The photographer and others have confirmed that this was part of your attempt to hoax a ghost story in early 1970.

You babble on about New Witchcraft magazine and then say "there is no need to say anything further really." Oh yes there is! Let's see the picture you refer to in New Witchcraft and compare it with the ones at the links provided by me from the VRS archive. If it is the same image it will still show your face as ghost-like, as if flour or something similar has been applied to give the appearance of death. The question as to why you did this is the stumbling block you cannot get past.

There can be no shortage of photographic experts who are more than welcome to examine these photographs of you with a white face. Let's see whether they think the face has been tampered with or doctored in any way, shall we?

When you had exhausted fake ghosts stories and copy-cat vampire claims, you found a new bandwagon to embark upon: phoney witchcraft! Perhaps you would care to explain to everyone the meaning of the Hornsey Journal article at the link below? Its headline is "I will sacrifice cat at Hallowe'en: Farrant" and in the article it is revealed you told the newspaper you had purchased an "unwanted" cat for the purpose of ritual sacrifice in a witchcraft ceremony.

This was around the time you were notoriously sending clay effigies impaled with pins to all and sundry in a desperate bid to conjur up some publicity for yourself. In the image below you are seen with a ritual dagger in one hand and one of the clay effigies in another:

Why would you want people to believe you were putting curses on them with black magic dolls?

Why would you want everyone to believe you sacrificed cats in disgusting ceremonies where you claimed to use the blood of the animals to perform bizarre witchcraft rituals?

User offline. Last seen 2 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

“Let's see the picture you refer to in New Witchcraft and compare it with the ones at the links provided by me from the VRS archive.”

I have named the magazine (New Witchcraft No 1) who published the photograph YOU sent to them anonymous. This photograph and others in that set were all taken on the same occasion and they were taken by YOURSELF, ‘anonymous’. I have irrefutable proof of this, as you can be clearly heard admitting to myself on tape that you held the copyright and the negatives of these photographs. I have published transcripts of these conversations in my book “The Seangate Tapes” and I would invite anybody here to send me a PM should they want to read this book. I would then send it to them. If they were still in any doubt, I would also send them a copy of the original tapes/s and they could then see exactly who it is who is lying here.

You say that the ‘vampire research society’ obtained these photographs from some unnamed photographer. Then perhaps you could verify for us who this was, ‘anonymous’, and the date you obtained these. That should be not be too difficult for you . . . if it was true at least. Shall we all see how you evade answering that. ‘anonymous’, which you obviously will!

None of this ‘Data Protection Act’ nonsense which you are so fond of employing when you get yourself into a tight spot, ‘anonymous’ – just identify the photographer.

Now, you have persistently (and adamantly) stated that the first time you met myself was on March 13th 1970 - the date ITV were interviewing both you and myself about the Highgate ‘vampire’. That’s very strange, because many of your photographs from that set (including the two you have since ‘doctored’ for us here) clearly show snow on the ground in Highgate Cemetery. Would you care to explain that?

I am sure we are all waiting!

I am not going to get involved in accusations against Barbara Green on another thread. I simply do not have the time.

But I did NOT say that the “bishop” in question had admitted receiving the booklet. What I said was, was that YOU, writing under the alias of ‘demonologist’, had later admitted that the manuscript from the woman in question had been received by a ‘VRS’ member but was ‘thrown straight into the bin’. But I also made it quite clear that as “demonologist” was only an alias employed by the “bishop”, this point was really only a technicality ‘demonologist’ (sorry, meant to say ‘anonymous’ there, slight ‘over-sight’!). Stop deliberately trying to twist my words, ‘anonymous’.

But back to the Highgate Cemetery photographs . . . Who was the photographer who took these photographs ‘anonymous’, and how come there was snow on the paths of Highgate Cemetery? Well?

David Farrant, President, BPOS

Vampire Research Society's picture
Vampire Researc...
User offline. Last seen 6 years 32 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

" I have irrefutable proof of this, as you can be clearly heard admitting to myself on tape that you held the copyright and the negatives of these photographs."

That aside, it is a matter of public record that Tony Hill transferred copyright of all the pictures he took of you at Highgate Cemetery throughout 1970, including the negative film, to the BOS president who is also the current VRS president. The original copyright obviously belonged to Hill. It does so no longer. Hill himself will vouch that this is the case. Hill's photographs of you were taken from early 1970 (when there was snow on the ground) to August of that year.

You can clearly be heard on secretly recorded tapes from over forty years ago to be conspiring with Hill to hoax a ghost story for your local newspaper. Hill tape-recorded you without your knowledge. If you give the VRS consent to publish these tapes (required legally because they were made without your knowledge and consent) we will gladly publish them on the internet along with extracts on sound files. All we need is your signed permission to do so. If you prefer to send a signed document to this effect on a jpeg file to the VRS that will be acceptable.

"Now, you have persistently (and adamantly) stated that the first time you met myself was on March 13th 1970."

I have never met you. I have only seen your ugly mug on televised interviews. That is quite enough for me, thank you very much. See

What I am waiting to hear is how you came to witness the entity three times which later became two times which later became only one time? How did you manage to forget the number of times you saw the supernatural being?

What I am also waiting to hear is why you exclusively employed Christian symbols for self-protection when you later claimed you were a "wiccan"; indeed, a "high priest of witchcraft" according to your retrospective scribblings.

And, of course, everyone would be fascinated to learn why you wanted the media and the public to believe you sacrificed cats in so-called witchcraft ceremonies at Highgate Woods among other places?

See and

User offline. Last seen 2 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

That's fine, you have now admitted what I have been saying all along. That Toni Hill was a close friend of your's and worked in a ohotographic studio with yourself. Between the pair of you, you concocted all kinds of publicity-making stunts. The most well known of these was your assertion to have 'staked' the Highgate 'vampire' after it had moved to the cellars of a derelict Gothic mansion in Crouch end (you then clain you incinerated it using a can of petrol) and then to have 'staked' this 'vampire's' disciple to another North London cemetery in 1982 after she had turned into a 'giant spider'. Hardly anybody believes this, so why should they believe any of your other claims - including the obsessive one's you keep making about myself?

Another small point: You adamertly assert (though another lie)that you never met myself before March 13th 1970 (the date of the television filming). How then do you explain a photograph of us both together in Highgate Cemetery that appeared on the front page of the Ham & High newspaper a week earlier?

I have answered your question about the 'ghost sightings' on numerous occasions, so the question really is, why do you keep repeating a question that I have already been answered?

I have explained that when I first wrote to the newspaper requesting information about the widely reported ghost (that you agree dated back to Victorian times), I stated that the entity had been seen (then that is) on at least 3 occasions. This is the case, and I had spoken to 3 witnesses who claimed to have sighted it. These witness I may identified in my book Beyond the Highgate Vampire. I did not say I had seen it 'on three occasions. That is just the way my reader's letter ended up being edited.

Two of our nightly watchers also spotted the figure again (at least one of them did) while keeping a nightly vigil in HC trying to get some photograph evidence of the reported entity. So in all it was sighted twice by Society members
(up until the time of my letter) including my own sighting.

Now, how about telling us all about this 'giant spider'. It would certainly make a change from all your groundless allegations against myself!

David Farrant, President, BPOS

User offline. Last seen 6 years 16 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

I,Personally,think that what you did to that old tramp you found in that house in Crouch End,is terrible!What must the poor mans relatives have thought when they were informed that a member of the public had attacked their poor old Dad with a stake,and then attempted to pour petrol all over him.You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself!I spoke to one relative and they said " the last we heard was Dad was sleeping rough,and this nutter came along,found Dad and kept ranting about vampires!"Newspaper reports at the time commented that the police were called to a house in Crouch End where they thankfully,caught a man who was about to pour petrol on an old tramp.The clearly disturbed arson maniac,kept on about vampires,and was still taken away ranting to the local mental home.the relative added "Hes a complete nutter,we dont want his sort round here".Police added that it would be a long time before the man, who could only answer to the name of "tea cosy" was let out.

Vampire Research Society's picture
Vampire Researc...
User offline. Last seen 6 years 32 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Jun 2010
Re: The Highgate Vampire - How It All Began - by David ...

"Between the pair of you, you concocted all kinds of publicity-making stunts."

You can't be referring to me, but, given who you are trying to malign, where is the evidence to substantiate your allegation?

Tony Hill played no part in the Highgate Vampire investigation. He was not a member of the British Occult Society or the Vampire Research Society. He was loosely associated with the VRS founder at a time when he worked part-time in the latter's studio darkroom as a printer, but that relationship soured in 1969 when Hill ran off for six months with someone known to you, someone who was not his wife. Almost a decade passed before things were on the mend, at which time copyright of pictures and film were donated by Hill to the VRS.

For the record, Hill does not believe in the supernatural, rather like yourself, and has provided irrefutable evidence in the form of secretly recorded conversations of you and him that in early 1970 you were both trying to hoax a ghost story. You fell out with Hill in September of that year when you renaged on the deal with him to come clean about the hoax you had both colluded in.

"Hardly anybody believes this, so why should they believe any of your other claims - including the obsessive one's you keep making about myself?"

Look, hardly anyone believes in anything genuinely supernatural unless they are religious or have experienced such phenomena personally themselves. The claims I keep making about you are backed by sourced evidence via links. You will not, probably cannot, answer any of the questions I raise.

"Another small point: You adamertly assert (though another lie)that you never met myself before March 13th 1970 (the date of the television filming). How then do you explain a photograph of us both together in Highgate Cemetery that appeared on the front page of the Ham & High newspaper a week earlier?"

You are addressing me as if I am the VRS president. I am not. I am nonetheless a VRS member. Nobody has ever claimed you both didn't meet before 13 March 1970. It is claimed by me that you met in March 1970. The VRS president himself often decsribes his first meeting with you as late February or early March 1970. Either way, the Hampstead & Highgate Express front page displaying a picture of you meeting the then BOS president is dated 6 March 1970. See links:

"I have answered your question about the 'ghost sightings' on numerous occasions, so the question really is, why do you keep repeating a question that I have already been answered?"

No, you haven't. Where is your answer? More important, what is your answer? I only keep repeating this question because it has NOT been answered. See link to the contradictory claims you have made regarding sighting the Highgate entity:

"I stated that the entity had been seen (then that is) on at least 3 occasions [by other people]."

No, you didn't. You claimed in your letter to the Hampstead & Highgate Express, 6 February 1970, that YOU had seen it on three occasions. These are your exact words:

"On three occasions I have seen what appeared to be a ghost-like figure inside the gates at the top of Swains Lane."

Your published letter then goes on to describe those three sightings, all of them happening between Christmas Eve 1969 and a week before you wrote your letter in February 1970. Each time you preface your sighting with "I saw it ..." etc.

"These witness I may identified in my book Beyond the Highgate Vampire."

Your pamphlet Beyond the Highgate Vampire identifies nobody whatsoever beyond reference to the non-existent "Thornton" who has NEVER been produced because he does not exist. Your pamphlet contains two pages of text stolen from The Highgate Vampire and infringes photographic copyright.

"Two of our nightly watchers also spotted the figure again (at least one of them did) while keeping a nightly vigil in HC trying to get some photograph evidence of the reported entity."

You had no "members" and your so-called "society" did not exist. You keep forgetting the secretly tape-recorded conversations you had with Hill. Everyone who knew you, including your own wife, will attest to the fact that you had a few drinking associates and that is all. You were not involved in witchcraft, the occult or paranormal investigation. In 1970 you made no pretence about it. You were a lone publicity-seeker looking for a bandwagon to hop on. Everyone who knew you back then has confirmed this to be so.

Now, how about telling us what you were doing with Christian symbols for self-protection when you later claimed that all along you had been a "high priest of witchcraft"? See link:

And what about your claim to have ritually slaughtered cats in bizarre witchcraft ceremonies? See links:



Recent comments

Featured Site