by Mysteryshopper ·
by Ian · Published November 5, 2012 · Last modified November 23, 2018
by Ian · Published July 22, 2008 · Last modified January 1, 2019
by Ian · Published January 2, 2016 · Last modified December 15, 2018
More
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Re: Grimsby investigation
You need to scroll down to the ‘Ghost Hunting’ video.
(Sorry for the second post, I can’t seemn to edit the existing one, even though I only just put it up!)
Re: Grimsby investigation
Interesting video Mysteryshopper. Aside from my feelings about a professional group that thing an orb is newsworthy , I am not convinced about this figure they seem to have caught. I think it looks somebody is playing the fool, easily done when you investigate in the dark.
PS. I’ll look into the editing issue đŸ™‚
Re: Grimsby investigation
I think that it is a person (living), Sorry but it looks like someone messing around to me.
Re: Grimsby investigation
I don’t actively investigate ghosts, but I don’t think they play peek a boo……do they? I suppose it all depends upon what sort of procedures they put in place to prevent anyone from accidently appearing on camera. I don’t think it is a genuine ghost.
Re: Grimsby investigation
Hard to tell in the dark, video is grainy shame the lights were not on. It does look like someone having a laugh, but then difficult to make a call on it without further information. It would only take one person from a group to fool around and then not be able to admit it later – other members would be none the wiser. Certianly not suggesting that is the case here but how can you prove one way or the other – it could be genuine.