Spectacular Sighting in Channel…

Spectacular Sighting in Channel…

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Ian Topham says:

    Re: Spectacular Sighting in Channel…

    I don’t keep on top of the UFO scene as I should and I missed this one.  Its a good case isn’t it.  What are the odds that some other military power may have had an aircraft in British and French airspace.  Maybe the Americans.

    I’m tempted to stick this sighting up in the gazatteer if you don’t mind Mauro.

  2. Mauro says:

    Re: Spectacular Sighting in Channel…
    Sure, go ahead.

    In the recent, award winning UFOs: Generals, Pilot and Government Officials Go on Record Captain Bowyer (a contributor) added two things. The first thing is the objects size, which he put at "one mile", an astonishing size but coherent with other "motherships" reported over the years by other pilots (including a much publicized sighting by the crew of a Japanese 747 freighter over the Artic). The second is that, according to further research, both the French and British military were well aware of the objects but "weren’t bothered by it".
    We could speculate at length why they weren’t "bothered" but without solid proof we could end up entangled in the usual net of conspiracy theories.
    Nick Pope stated "NATO has very advanced aircraft you won’t see at Farnborough next year". He was, of course, right as proven by the recent capture by the Iranian of a RQ170 drone by the Iranian (they most likely used Russian technology to interfere with the craft guidance system and force it to crash land, but that’s another matter completely). The RQ170 was previously known as the "Beast of Kandahar" since it was first spied at that Afghan location but its existence was always denied.
    Intelligence-gathering platforms and operations have always been shady to say the least. For example very little is known of RAF operation over Soviet Russia.
    But what good would be a one mile long aircraft easily traced by civilian radar is a complete mystery.